Members
Review of The Black Hole
I saw the Black Hole when I was a kid in a format worthy of its effects, 70mm. The new video release with widescreen format takes me back to when I was ten and really dug this movie. For a ten year old this movie is great.

For an adult, well, the plot, physics and acting have a few problems that negate the childhood nostalgia. The plot had no real problems with it other than connecting the dots better. Had it been tighter I think many of the other problems would have been less of an issue. Physics is another big problem, there are a number of scenes towards the end where either the black hole's gravity of vacuum of space should have presented bigger problems when the Cygnus was falling apart. Lastly the acting was a little flat, but that might be due to the problematic script if rewrites were all to common.

The special effects, even by today’s CGI standards, is good. For 1979 they were great! It might have been nice to see Disney revamp some of the effects with CGI, like BBC did with Red Dwarf. The sets are well dressed and the effects around them are good fun (so long as you ignore some rules of physics). From an RPG perspective it gives a good campy set up for an installment in a campaign or multi-session stand alone effort. If anyone in your group is under the age of thirty there is a good chance they have never seen The Black Hole, which will likely help. But even if they have seen the film there are so many plot tweaks that could be added (and likely should have been added to the film) that it could prove to be an enjoyable experience.

The Black Hole is still good fun, twenty years later, but it is hardly a classic science fiction film in the manner Star Wars or Star Trek II might be.

PDF Store: Buy This Item from DriveThruRPG

Please help support RPGnet by purchasing the following (probably) related items through DriveThruRPG.



Recent Forum Posts
Post TitleAuthorDate
Think that is bad, try thisRPGnet ReviewsJune 23, 2003 [ 05:58 am ]
RE: Better than 2001?!RPGnet ReviewsJune 19, 2003 [ 12:05 pm ]
RE: Homoeroticism in Disney?!?!?RPGnet ReviewsJune 19, 2003 [ 11:22 am ]
RE: I totally disagree.RPGnet ReviewsJune 19, 2003 [ 06:29 am ]
RE: Homoeroticism in Disney?!?!?RPGnet ReviewsJune 14, 2003 [ 08:51 am ]
RE: Homoeroticism in Disney?!?!?RPGnet ReviewsJune 13, 2003 [ 03:51 pm ]
RE: Homoeroticism in Disney?!?!?RPGnet ReviewsJune 13, 2003 [ 02:26 pm ]
Homoeroticism in Disney?!?!?RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 10:43 pm ]
RE: Remake of the Black HoleRPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 06:52 pm ]
Burton and ApesRPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 01:35 pm ]
Remake of the Black HoleRPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 01:30 pm ]
RE: I totally disagree.RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 01:27 pm ]
RE: USS Cygnus, baby!RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 01:21 pm ]
RE: PhysicsRPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 01:20 pm ]
RE: Better than 2001?!RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 01:17 pm ]
RE: Better than 2001?!RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 09:16 am ]
RE: Better than 2001?!RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 07:54 am ]
RE: I totally disagree.RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 07:22 am ]
RE: Better than 2001?!RPGnet ReviewsJune 12, 2003 [ 05:40 am ]

Copyright © 1996-2013 Skotos Tech, Inc. & individual authors, All Rights Reserved
Compilation copyright © 1996-2013 Skotos Tech, Inc.
RPGnet® is a registered trademark of Skotos Tech, Inc., all rights reserved.