Tmo0ίyڗ4 RAh~4ɑXK6L;'!}Z瞻{aj S1mF ǹD,S"FXDEQB!B&Cv s4RcJovĂBYJdֈ7 +f$t _O# x$*BId69W#10E`ujN&k;E UFdB~S䔖qP آ҂8|! Feyv㸲4|{F=*Rn] S+QGe y梴DEV]']U&J$ĻD;Z^{T=ݶRWD+.%*T'ʲ=kKqyBHuu Ba0 k VoV|HjMq/y1kјϔY.0ۢR;8 q)1}$X(Lv.׋ex ߧ8X*;uWQԃM.u%_^_%zMd8.NV*ysf|,ê ?LFZ q8I!r7jHLgX^O&zM`j`2 m\)i<ՀT'U_]zd=ݴiK1j.

The Seven Models Of Roleplay

by The Intrepid (Levi) Kornelsen

My main issue with the terminology of roleplayers is the lack of terms for description of games themselves. Peter is a munchkin, we hear, and Bob is an overactor. Both have a valid stance, but the only way those stances are ever approached is through humor.

So, here's my view: a base of seven models, described by way of the stances of the players *and* of the GM.

This would make for seven stances, or player archetypes, as well. Actor, Author, Gamer, In Character, Guest, Enthusiast, and Experimenter... I think.

[ Read FAQ | Subscribe to RSS | Partner Sites | Contact Us | Advertise with Us ]

Copyright © 1996-2009 Skotos Tech, Inc. & individual authors, All Rights Reserved
Compilation copyright © 1996-2009 Skotos Tech, Inc.
RPGnet® is a registered trademark of Skotos Tech, Inc., all rights reserved.