Bag o' Nifties: Tricks for GMs
Non-Combat Actions in Combat-Focused Games
by Dan BaynDec 04,2002
|
|
|
|||
Bag o' Nifties: Tricks for GMsNon-Combat Actions in Combat-Focused Gamesby Dan BaynDec 04,2002
| Non-Combat Actions in Combat-Focused GamesThe Problem I write action games. It's what I do. Even the most combat-oriented games, however, sometimes involve a little (get ready for it...) talking. Talking to NPCs, to be specific. Or maybe some computer hacking, to use the vernacular, or a bit of clandestine sneaking around. None of these are particularly action-packing roller coasters of role-playing chills and thrills, but that doesn't mean our action-packed game systems can't handle them. Even the most pacifist scenes can benefit from the tricks we use to liven up our fight scenes. The Solution: Pornographic Detail The key is to reward players for describing their actions in almost pornographic detail. To put it another way (probably a better way), you have to encourage your players to embellish creatively. "I attack him with my sword," for example, is not nearly as evocative as, "The sun glints off my blade as I slash down across the villain's torso, adjusting the angle at the last second to deflect his next attack." I've suggested rules mechanics for encouraging just this kind of play in a few of my past articles. With the right approach, they can also be applied to non-combat actions. The more rewards you can offer players for coming up with these kinds of details, the more entertaining your game session will be. If your system hands out modifiers for tactical details like weapon size and flanking, hand out those same modifiers for dramatic and technical details. If it awards points for role-playing a character's flaws or motivation, award the same points for getting the group to laugh or cheer with an entertaining description. In Blur, each card played from your hand corresponds to a combat maneuver; for non-combat action, each card should be played with an embellishment of some kind (see below). In Wushu a> (formerly "Stunt Dice"), the size of a dice pool depends on how many embellishments a player can come up with, whether combat-related or otherwise. Interrogation of NPCs is a classic example. Players may just want to use their Intimidation Skill (or whatever), but merely rolling the dice shortchanges what could otherwise be a dramatic scene. So, you encourage a little embellishment. Most people have seen enough cop shows and movies to know the basic tricks. Have two PCs play Good Cop, Bad Cop: One threatens the suspect with incarceration or violence (1), and then the other "protects" the NPC by pulling the Bad Cop away (1) and asking the NPC nicely (1). Add those rewards up (3) and then let one of the players make a roll. Details, details, details. Technical folks are good with details, or so I hear, and technical actions can certainly benefit from some creative embellishment. If you're running a modern game with players who really know their characters' areas of expertise, let them add some gritty details to their descriptions. Brand names, acronyms, and metric measurements are all good candidates. If you're running a sci-fi game, take a page from the Star Trek Episode Writer's Handbook and start making up all the wackyon particles and phoneyon fields you can stand! Well, that's how I go about it, anyway. If you've ever played the high quality card game Lunch Money, you know exactly what I'm talking about. If you haven't played it, what the Hell are you still sitting at that computer for? Go find a deck and try it out! Move! A Note on Parsimony Reading over this, it all seems profoundly simple. Hopefully, it won't elicit too much slapping of foreheads. If it does, make sure you have an ice pack handy and check for concussions. I apologize for any memory loss. Next Time: Making magic more scientific! Bayn.org - Loath Your Fellow Man | |
| Topics | Author | Date | Latest Reply |
| Outstanding! (2) new | Brian Cooksey | 06-06-2003 18:29 | 06-09-2003 20:08 new |
| Blatant Ad (9) new | Declan | 06-04-2003 11:34 | 06-19-2003 14:28 new |
| Exalted or 7th Sea also good (2) new | Benjamin | 05-08-2003 05:13 | 05-14-2003 09:43 new |
| Dreamwalker and the Matrix (1) new | Peter C. Spahn | 05-07-2003 19:19 | 05-07-2003 19:19 new |
| The Matrix rebuttal (8) new | Charles Phipps | 05-07-2003 17:14 | 05-21-2003 22:55 new |
| for those of you who are annoyed with the dice (4) new | carbonized | 04-12-2003 22:54 | 05-11-2003 14:03 new |
| Interesting (3) new | PEL | 04-12-2003 13:00 | 04-13-2003 10:22 new |
| resaling (3) new | brandon | 04-10-2003 17:43 | 06-06-2004 18:42 new |
| I like the Flip system (2) new | Ryan Paddy | 04-10-2003 16:00 | 04-11-2003 12:33 new |
| Still Too Cumbersome! (2) new | Sarducci | 04-10-2003 10:09 | 04-11-2003 12:26 new |
| One roll combat (1) new | Mr. Teapot | 04-09-2003 15:39 | 04-09-2003 15:39 new |
| Third Party Intervention (3) new | Samhaine | 04-09-2003 09:18 | 04-09-2003 18:26 new |
| Thoughts about splats... (1) new | Wyvern | 02-08-2003 13:00 | 02-08-2003 13:00 new |
| Nice (1) new | Leo Comerford | 02-08-2003 11:05 | 02-08-2003 11:05 new |
| Suggested reading (2) new | Alban | 01-10-2003 03:45 | 02-25-2003 11:32 new |
| The will of the scientist (2) new | Harlequin Jones | 01-08-2003 12:25 | 01-08-2003 17:36 new |
| Science and magic (7) new | Mant | 01-08-2003 11:38 | 07-25-2005 20:27 new |
| Universality of Magic (9) new | Allthumbs | 01-08-2003 09:23 | 01-11-2003 16:29 new |
| Fix that link for Wushu (5) new | Spastic | 12-04-2002 10:40 | 12-06-2002 06:51 new |
| 'Ferals' vs regs (2) new | Fade | 11-26-2002 04:55 | 11-26-2002 08:41 new |
| Question about Blur (2) new | Quinzel | 11-25-2002 14:40 | 11-26-2002 08:31 new |
| Nifty indeed (1) new | Barbara | 11-07-2002 16:06 | 11-07-2002 16:06 new |
| Take a look at "Orion's Arm" (1) new | Kalregorn | 11-07-2002 10:51 | 11-07-2002 10:51 new |
| I think your examples aren't mysterious enough... (4) new | Mike Elkins | 11-07-2002 08:45 | 11-09-2002 15:51 new |
| Empire of the East (3) new | Reed | 11-07-2002 07:26 | 11-07-2002 11:23 new |
| Cool. (2) new | Harlequin Jones | 11-06-2002 18:11 | 11-07-2002 05:45 new |
| Nice article (3) new | Michael B. Erb | 11-06-2002 13:23 | 11-07-2002 11:21 new |
| Another source of inspiration (1) new | Patrick Clark | 11-06-2002 11:30 | 11-06-2002 11:30 new |
| re: Telepathy as Brain Hacking (4) new | Moondragon | 09-06-2002 22:52 | 02-13-2004 03:10 new |
| Pedantic Note (2) new | AstroGeoff | 09-06-2002 16:21 | 09-07-2002 17:35 new |
|
[ Read FAQ | Subscribe to RSS | Contact Us | Advertise with Us ] |