Author: Eliot Lefebvre (---.uconn.edu)
Date: 07-18-2002 05:00
Still not -great-, but better. About as coherent as the last one, and there's actually some vaguely useful information buried in the mass here. Nothing that I haven't seen before, but at least it's presented in a format that makes the column actually worth reading and involves material that approaches something worth puzzling out.
Of course, you're still pompous, self-righteous, and prone to obscuring your actual meaning or denying it away whenever humanly possible. And you're still locked into the thought of "people who disagree with me = evil, stupid people" as opposed to the simple fact that some people just disagree with your premises. Which, in and of itself, isn't a particular problem with this column as much as the other two... it just makes reading and commenting on the ideas within a damn sight less rewarding.
-Eliot "On the other hand, at least there are ideas worth commenting on" Lefebvre
|
|
