Author: Jocelyn Robitaille (---.videotron.ca)
Date: 01-23-2002 22:32
The idea of a list of the GM's deadliest Sins is mighty cool. I jumped on the article with interest, expecting to get some insight at best, or some laughs at least.
I got neither. I am a very disappointed Joce.
I mean, the Sins could've stated something else than the obvious: they didn't.
They could've stated the obvious but be explained in a fashion a bit that raised questions, provoked thoughts. They sure didn't, they explained the obvious, in an obvious fashion.
They could've stated the obvious, explain it in an obbvious fashion, but be funny. I'm not laughing.
No offense, but I could've written what I just read in the time it takes me to type it. Unless it was written for newbies (in which case it shouldn't take for granted that the readers know what it's all about, which the author does), this could've used a *lot* more work.
I'm not too big on dissing other people's work, but hell...
Jocelyn
P.S.: Oh, and since I'm being all nitpicky and shit... there are *10* commandments and *7* deadly sins. But that in itself would've been no problem.
|
|
