Notice: Undefined variable: adPrefs in /var/www/rpgnet/include/header-sub.phtml on line 7

Notice: Undefined variable: coLogo in /var/www/rpgnet/include/header-sub.phtml on line 23
RPGnet
 
 Size v.s. Strength
Author: SteelCaress (---.bhcinfo.com)
Date:   08-18-2005 13:11

Size does not always mean Strength.

Strength (In my view) is the ability to exert a certain amount of physical force. That is, lifting, punching, etc. Unlike D&D, it doesn't allow you to hit more often.

Size (again, IMHO) is a measure of body mass. One may factor Size into the ability to withstand physical punishment (like Hit Points in BRP, also in Villains & Vigilantes), and in Villains & Vigilantes it also affected Agility.

In the real world, there are massive steroid monsters who are heavy and strong (Brock Lesner from WWE comes to mind -- a Google image search will show you what I mean). But look at the massively overweight guy walking down the street? Do you think he can lift a huge amount because he has to drag that weight around with him all day long? Or do you think that he may be desk-bound, leading a sedentary lifestyle, and may not be able to lift much more than 100 lbs (45 kg)? My father is heavier than I am, due to a gut, and can't lift as much as I, because I exercise moderately and do lift weights (so I can fight the midwinter bulge). I'm lighter (lower Size), but I can lift more (higher Strength).

Just some things to think about. I eagerly await your next installment.

 Topics Author  Date
 Size v.s. Strength  
SteelCaress 08-18-2005 13:11 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Sergio Mascarenhas 08-18-2005 21:04 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Jethrow 08-29-2005 02:07 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Sergio Mascarenhas 08-29-2005 03:13 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Jethrow 08-29-2005 03:39 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Sergio Mascarenhas 08-29-2005 04:20 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Jethrow 08-29-2005 04:41 
 RE: Size v.s. Strength  new
Sergio Mascarenhas 08-29-2005 05:47 

 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:
 Your Email:
 Subject:
Email replies to this thread, to the address above.